Journal of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Apical Debris Extrusion during Root Canal Preparation with ProTaper Next and Mani Silk Rotary Systems: An in vitro Study

Madhusudhana Koppolu, Chinni Suneelkumar, Anumula Lavanya, Ram Basam

Citation Information : Koppolu M, Suneelkumar C, Lavanya A, Basam R. Apical Debris Extrusion during Root Canal Preparation with ProTaper Next and Mani Silk Rotary Systems: An in vitro Study. J Oper Dent Endod 2016; 1 (2):66-69.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0014

Published Online: 01-12-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris after the preparation of root canals in extracted human single-rooted teeth using ProTaper Next and Mani Silk rotary systems.

Materials and methods

A total of 40 freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth with mature apices and straight root canal were selected and similar length were instrumented with ProTaper Next and Mani Silk rotary systems. Debris and irrigant extruded during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The Eppendorf tubes were then stored in an incubator at 68°C for 5 days. The weight of the extruded debris was determined by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Postweights were compared with an independent t test for 2 groups.

Results

Both instruments were associated with apical debris extrusion. There was no significant difference between the ProTaper Next and Mani Silk instruments in terms of mean weight of apically extruded debris.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of mean weight of apically extruded debris.

How to cite this article

Koppolu M, Basam R, Suneelkumar C, Lavanya A. Apical Debris Extrusion during Root Canal Preparation with ProTaper Next and Mani Silk Rotary Systems: An in vitro Study. J Oper Dent Endod 2016;1(2):66-69.


PDF Share
  1. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors 1985. J Endod 2004 Jul;30(7):476-481.
  2. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod 1995 Mar;21(3):154-158.
  3. Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several NiTi systems. Int Endod J 2015 Jul;48(7):701-704.
  4. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems -an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2010 Oct;1(4):234-236.
  5. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filling and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991 Jun;17(6):275-279.
  6. The influence of two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta analysis. Int Endod J 2016 Mar;49(3):255-270.
  7. A quantitative assessment of canal debris forced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques. J Endod 1987 Dec;13(12):554-558.
  8. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015 Mar;48(3):283-286.
  9. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with twisted file adaptive instruments in straight root canals: Reciprocation with different angles, adaptive motion, and continuous rotation. Int Endod J 2016 Apr;49(4):382-385.
  10. Available from: http://www.protapernext.com/benefits-concept.html.
  11. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next nickeltitanium rotary files. Int Endod J 2014 Nov;47(11):1034-1039.
  12. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2009 Nov;35(11):1589-1593.
  13. An overview of the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Endod Top 2013 Sep;29(1):42-54.
  14. Available from: http://www.mani.co.jp .
  15. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J 2014 May;47(5):405-409.
  16. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system. Clin Oral Investig 2015 Mar;19(2):357-361.
  17. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. J Endod 2015 Feb;41(2):237-241.
  18. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system. J Endod 2014 Apr;40(4):526-529.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.