Journal of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  9 (2024)
Volume  8 (2023)
Volume  7 (2022)
Volume  6 (2021)
Volume  5 (2020)
Volume  4 (2019)
Volume  3 (2018)
Volume  2 (2017)
Volume  1 (2016)
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2023 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Sodium Hypochlorite Interaction with Other Root Canal Irrigants: A Systematic Review

Niveditha Balamurali, Rathna Piriyanga, Geeth Deepika, Azhagu Abirami, Anand Sherwood

Keywords : Endodontic irrigants, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, Root canal disinfection, Sodium hypochlorite

Citation Information : Balamurali N, Piriyanga R, Deepika G, Abirami A, Sherwood A. Sodium Hypochlorite Interaction with Other Root Canal Irrigants: A Systematic Review. J Oper Dent Endod 2023; 8 (1):11-16.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0129

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-04-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: The root canal system is essential for successful endodontic treatment, demanding effective irrigation and disinfection. Sodium hypochlorite, valued for its low viscosity, serves as a versatile agent with lubricating, antimicrobial, and pulp tissue dissolving properties. However, its increasing concentration correlates with heightened antibacterial efficacy and tissue dissolution, accompanied by increased toxicity. Combined root canal irrigant use is common to address individual limitations, necessitating an understanding of their chemical interactions and potential effects. Methods: This systematic review adheres to PRISMA guidelines, with a registered protocol on PROSPERO. A thorough search strategy encompassed PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, focusing on English-language articles published from 2003 to 2023. Duplicate removal utilized Zotero, while title/abstract screening employed Rayyan online software. Two authors conducted full-text reviews and data extraction, addressing inclusion and exclusion criteria and resolving discrepancies through discussion. Results: The review explores the chemical interactions of sodium hypochlorite with various agents, including chlorhexidine, alexidine, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid, etidronate, octenidine, MTAD, Q mix and select natural products. Each interaction is analyzed for its implications on root canal treatment, encompassing potential benefits and adverse effects. Conclusion: Understanding the interactions between sodium hypochlorite and diverse root canal irrigants is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. The review synthesizes current literature to provide insights into the complex interplay of these agents, facilitating informed decision-making in endodontic practice.

PDF Share
  1. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Moeintaghavi A, et al. A review over benefits and drawbacks of combining sodium hypochlorite with other endodontic materials. Open Dent J 2017;11:661–669. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601711010661.
  2. Kaur P. Role of irrigants in endodontics. J Dent Probl Solut 2020;7: 100–104. DOI: 10.17352/2394-8418.000093.
  3. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J 2014;216:299–303. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.204.
  4. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. Root canal irrigants. J Conserve Dent 2010;13:256–264. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.73378.
  5. Shenoy A, Bolla N, Sayish, et al. Assessment of precipitate formation on interaction of irrigants used in different combinations: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2013;24:451–455. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.118392.
  6. Almfudi M. The chemical interactions between endodontic irrigants: A literature review. University of Lisbon: 2019, pp. 1–32.
  7. Siddique R, Sureshbabu NM, Somasundaram J, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of precipitate formation following interaction of chlorhexidine with sodium hypochlorite, neem, and tulsi. J Conserv Dent 2019;22:40–47. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_284_18.
  8. Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Zaia AA, et al. Chlorhexidine in endodontics. Braz Dent J 2013;24:89–102. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201302188.
  9. Bernardi A, Teixeira CS. The properties of chlorhexidine and undesired effects of its use in endodontics. Quintessence Int 2015;46:575–582. PMID: 25918757.
  10. Orhan EO, Irmak Ö, Hür D, et al. Does para-chloroaniline really form after mixing sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine? J Endod 2016;42:455–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.024.
  11. Mortenson D, Sadilek M, Flake NM, et al. The effect of using an alternative irrigant between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine to prevent the formation of para-chloroaniline within the root canal system. Int Endod J 2012;45:878–882. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02048.x.
  12. Krishnamurthy S, Sudhakaran S. Evaluation and prevention of the precipitate formed on interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 2010;36:1154–1157. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.01.012.
  13. Jain K, Agarwal P, Jain S, et al. Alexidine versus chlorhexidine for endodontic irrigation with sodium hypochlorite. Eur J Dent 2018;12:398–402. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_180_17.
  14. Czopik B, Ciechomska M, Zarzecka J, et al. Insight into the reaction of alexidine with sodium hypochlorite: A potential error in endodontic treatment. Molecules 2021;26:1623. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26061623.
  15. da Silva TM, Alves FR, Lutterbach MT, et al. Comparison of antibacterial activity of alexidine alone or as a final irrigant with sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. BDJ Open 2018;4:18003. DOI: 10.1038/bdjopen.2018.3.
  16. Doumani M, HabibA, Doumani A. et al. A review: The applications of EDTA in endodontics (Part I). IOSR-JDMS. 2017;9:83–85. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1609058385.
  17. Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: Mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003;36:810–830. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00754.x
  18. Wright PP, Kahler B, Walsh LJ. Alkaline sodium hypochlorite irrigant and its chemical interactions. Materials (Basel) 2017;10:1147. DOI: 10.3390/ma10101147.
  19. Grande NM, Plotino G, Falanga A, et al. Interaction between EDTA and sodium hypochlorite: A nuclear magnetic resonance analysis. J Endod 2006;32:460–464. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.007.
  20. Zaparolli D, Saquy PC, Cruz-Filho AM. Effect of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA irrigation, individually and in alternation, on dentin microhardness at the furcation area of mandibular molars. Braz Dent J 2012;23:654–658. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000600005.
  21. Hardhitari R, Kamizar, Sumawinata N. Effects of 2.625% NaOCl - 20% citric acid and 2.625% NaOCl - 17% EDTA on cleanliness of smear layer on apical one third. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1073:62023. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/6/062023.
  22. Thaha KA, Varma RL, Nair MG, et al. Interaction between octenidine-based solution and sodium hypochlorite: A mass spectroscopy, proton nuclear magnetic resonance, and scanning electron microscopy-based observational study. J Endod 2017;43:135–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.015.
  23. Makkar S, Aggarwal A, Pasricha S, et al. Comparative evaluation of octenidine hydrochloride and chlorhexidine as antibacterial root canal irrigant. Indian J Oral Sci 2015;6:10–13.
  24. Tartari T, de Almeida Rodrigues Silva E Souza P, Vila Nova de Almeida B, et al. A new weak chelator in endodontics: Effects of different irrigation regimens with etidronate on root dentin microhardness. Int J Dent 2013; 2013:743018. DOI: 10.1155/2013/743018.
  25. Niyas FM, Subbarao C. Effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and etidronic acid in combination as a root canal irrigant with varying apical file sizes – an in vitro analyses. J Pharm Sci and Res 2017;5: 716–718. Corpus ID: 212575074.
  26. Singla MG, Garg A, Gupta S. MTAD in endodontics: An update review. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.015.
  27. Tay FR, Mazzoni A, Pashley DH, et al. Potential iatrogenic tetracycline staining of endodontically treated teeth via NaOCl/MTAD irrigation: A preliminary report. J Endod 2006;32:354–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.11.006.
  28. Kolosowski KP, Sodhi RN, Kishen A, et al. Qualitative analysis of precipitate formation on the surface and in the tubules of dentin irrigated with sodium hypochlorite and a final rinse of chlorhexidine or QMiX. J Endod 2014;40(12):2036–2040. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.017.
  29. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Qian W, et al. Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, QMiX. Int Endod J 2012;45:363–371. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01985.x.
  30. Sundaram D, Narayanan RK, Vadakkepurayil K. A comparative evaluation on antimicrobial effect of honey, neem leaf extract and sodium hypochlorite as intracanal irrigant: An ex-vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:88–91. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19268.8311.
  31. Susan AC, Bharathraj AR, Praveen M, et al. Intraradicular smear removal efficacy of triphala as a final rinse solution in curved canals: A scanning electron microscope study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11:420–428. DOI: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_55_19.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.