Journal of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Perfect Restorative Diagnosis: Myth or Reality?

Prasanna B Dhatavkar, Shalini D Aggarwal, Rhea S Digholkar, Neil V Lewis, Poorva S Kurtarkar, Piyush Oswal

Keywords : Dental caries, Diagnosis, Radiograph

Citation Information : Dhatavkar PB, Aggarwal SD, Digholkar RS, Lewis NV, Kurtarkar PS, Oswal P. Perfect Restorative Diagnosis: Myth or Reality?. J Oper Dent Endod 2021; 6 (1):11-13.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0104

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-11-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and objective: To summarize the basic and advanced diagnostic aids that are able to diagnose dental caries at both the nascent and the advanced stages. Background: Shift in the proportion of mineral loss and gain results in tooth caries, which is considered to be pathological. Tooth decay is a continuous process from a physiological to pathological one and is influenced by many variables. Thus, there is a lack of definite limit among healthy and diseased, owing to the subjective nature of the tooth loss and its potential to remineralize. Review results: In dental practice, the most commonly used tool is the traditional intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiograph that remains the standard for most of the clinician. But most clinicians are likely to use additional approaches for the detection of lesions, given the two-dimensional (2D) nature of the IOPA radiographs and the 3D invasiveness of dental caries. The objective of this view is to explore a well-rounded approach to diagnosis dental caries to eliminate as many surprises as possible while performing a restorative treatment. Conclusion: A diligent and methodical approach leads to the elimination of confounders and enables the clinician to arrive at a comprehensive diagnosis.


PDF Share
  1. Srilatha A, Doshi D, Kulkarni S, et al. Advanced diagnostic aids in dental caries – a review. J Global Oral Health 2019;2(2):118–127. DOI: 10.25259/JGOH_61_2019.
  2. Shivakumar AT, Kalgeri SH, Dhir S. Clinical considerations in restorative dentistry – a narrative review. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2015;7(2):122–129. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0754.164377.
  3. Gomez J. Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion. BMC Oral Health 2015;15(Suppl. 1):S3. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S3.
  4. Khasnis SA, Kidiyoor KH, Patil AB, et al. Vertical root fractures and their management. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(2):103–110. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.128034.
  5. Khalife MA, Boynton JR, Dennison JB, et al. In vivo evaluation of DIAGNOdent for the quantification of occlusal dental caries. Oper Dent 2009;34(2):136–141. DOI: 10.2341/08-54.
  6. Konstantinova D, Dimova M. Historical review of gnathodynamometric methods used for the assessment of masticatory function. J IMAB 2016;22(2):1226–1229. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2016223.1226.
  7. Hülya Y, Sultan K. Recent methods for diagnosis of dental caries in dentistry. Meandros Med Dent J 2018;19:1–8. DOI: 10.4274/meandros.21931.
  8. Abogazalah N, Ando M. Alternative methods to visual and radiographic examinations for approximal caries detection. J Oral Sci 2017;59(3):315–322. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.16-0595.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.