Successful Management of Fractured Premolar with Veneerlay Following Morphology-driven Preparation Technique Principles

Nandhini Shanmugasundaram; Subha Anirudhan; Minu Koshy; Remya Varghese; Nanthini Rajamanickam

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0125

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

Online First

Successful Management of Fractured Premolar with Veneerlay Following Morphology-driven Preparation Technique Principles

Nandhini Shanmugasundaram, Subha Anirudhan, Minu Koshy, Remya Varghese, Nanthini Rajamanickam

Keywords : Case report, Ceramics, Morphology-driven preparation technique, Veneerlay

Citation Information : Shanmugasundaram N, Anirudhan S, Koshy M, Varghese R, Rajamanickam N. Successful Management of Fractured Premolar with Veneerlay Following Morphology-driven Preparation Technique Principles. J Oper Dent Endod 2022; 7 (2):28-32.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0125

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 03-02-2024

ARTICLE
REFERENCES

Abstract

Recently, with rapid evolution in dental adhesive technology, less invasive approaches have been reported in contemporary restorative dentistry. New restorative materials such as onlay, inlay, and other indirect partial coverage restorations of teeth, retained by microretention through adhesives rather than macro-retention are increasingly accepted by dentists. Conventional crowns sacrifice amounts of residual sound hard tissues. Partial coverage restorations in the posteriors fulfill esthetic requirements while adhering to bioeconomic principles resulting in biomechanical strengthening of the remaining tooth structure. Veneerlays would be an excellent restoration option rather than using a full coverage restoration in many cases as it involves only the buccal and occlusal surfaces. This is a case report describing an indirect restoration for preparation using morphology-driven preparation technique (MDPT) principles and bonding of a veneerlay, which brings an esthetic and functional alternative to restoring the maxillary premolar teeth. Follow-up of the case has shown a successful outcome.

HTML PDF Share

Veneziani M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: Updated indications and the Morphology Driven Preparation Technique. Int J Esthet Dent 2017;12(2):204–230. PMID: 28653051.
Hegde VR, Joshi SR, Hattarki SA, et al. Morphology-driven preparation technique for posterior indirect bonded restorations. J Conserv Dent 2021;24(1):100–104. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_489_20.
Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, et al. Bonding of all-porcelain crowns: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Dental Mater 2001;17(2):156–164. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00059-2.
Morgan MJ, Brown DJ, Suh BI. Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) optimizing adhesive performance for indirect restoratives. Inside Dent 2010;6(3). PMID: 16316797.
Kois DE, Isvilanonda V, Chaiyabutr Y, et al. Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25(2):110–122. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12018.
Ma L, Guess PC, Zhang Y. Loadbearing properties of minimalinvasive monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: Finite element and theoretical analyses. Dent Mater 2013;29(7):742–751. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.004.
Griggs JA. Recent advances in materials for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(3):713–727. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.006.
Santos GC Jr, Santos MJMC, Rizkalla AS. Adhesive cementation of etchable ceramic esthetic restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 2009;75(5):379–384. PMID: 19531335.
Peumans M, Voet M, De Munck J, et al. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(3):739–750. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0762-9.

PDF Share