Journal of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2019 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Time-dependent Evaluation of the pH of Three Different Sealers

Arunajatesan Subbiya, Vanilarasu Thirumalai, Nagarajan Geethapriya, Kesavaram Padmavathy, Krishnan Mahalakshmi

Keywords : Epoxy resin sealer, pH, Root canal sealers,Bioceramic sealer

Citation Information : Subbiya A, Thirumalai V, Geethapriya N, Padmavathy K, Mahalakshmi K. Time-dependent Evaluation of the pH of Three Different Sealers. J Oper Dent Endod 2019; 4 (1):19-21.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0069

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pH of three different sealers—BioRoot RCS, Sealapex, and AH-plus at different time periods. Materials and methods: The diluted sealer was transferred to a clean dry test tube. The pH of the root canal sealers was assessed using a digital pH meter. The measurement was carried out at 37°C fluid temperature for all the samples to simulate the oral temperature. The pH measurements were carried out at the end of mixing time (0 hours), 4 hours, 8 hours, and at 24 hours before renewal of the test liquids. Statistical analysis was done using t test—comparison of two independent means. The statistical analysis was done using the post hoc tests. Results: The results of the study show that all the three sealers tested were alkaline in nature throughout the test periods. All the sealers showed a significant change during the time periods (p < 0.05). AH-plus showed a gradual reduction in pH within the range of 10–10.5. There was a statistically significant change at all time intervals between AH-plus and BioRoot RCS (p < 0.05), but no difference between Sealapex and BioRoot RCS or AH-plus (p > 0.05). Conclusion: All the three sealers used in this study are alkaline in nature, with BioRoot RCS showing the highest pH and AH-plus displaying the lowest with a significant difference between the two. There was no significant difference between BioRoot RCS and Sealapex at all time periods. Clinical significance: The antimicrobial activity of sealer is directly related to pH of sealer. The pH of three sealers—BioRoot RCS, Sealapex, and AH-plus are in the alkaline range up to 24 hours. Bioceramic sealer and Sealapex show the highest pH with no significant difference between them.


PDF Share
  1. Molander A, Reit C, et al. Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1998 Jan;31(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.t01-1-00111.x.
  2. Faria-Júnior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al. Antibiofilm activity, pH and solubility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2013 Aug;46(8):755–762. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12055.
  3. Siqueira Jr JF, Lopes HP. Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int Endod J 1999 Sep;32(5): 361–369. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00275.x.
  4. Leonardo MR, Da Silva LA, et al. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity of sealers and pastes used in endodontics. J Endod 2000 Jul 1; 26(7):391–394. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200007000-00003.
  5. Urban K, Neuhaus J, et al. Solubility and pH value of 3 different root canal sealers: a long-term investigation. J Endod 2018 Nov 1; 44(11):1736–1740. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.026.
  6. Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, et al. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2005 Feb 1;31(2): 97–100. DOI: 10.1097/01.DON.0000133155.04468.41.
  7. Massi S, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al. pH, Calcium Ion Release, and Setting Time of an experimental Mineral Trioxide Aggregate–based root canal sealer. J Endod 2011 Jun 1;37(6):844–846. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.033.
  8. de Miranda Candeiro GT, Correia FC, et al. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod 2012 Jun 1;38(6):842–845. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029.
  9. Zhou HM, Shen Y, et al. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 2013 Oct 1;39(10):1281–1286. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012.
  10. Duarte MA, de Oliveira Demarchi AC, et al. Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of three root canal sealers. J Endod 2000 Jul 1; 26(7):389–390. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200007000-00002.
  11. Poggio C, Dagna A, et al. Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: a comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent 2017 Oct;9(10):e1189. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54040.
  12. Kapralos V, Koutroulis A, et al. Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers against planktonic bacteria and bacteria in biofilms. J Endod 2018 Jan 1;44(1):149–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.023.
  13. Athanassiadis B, George GA, et al. A review of the effects of formaldehyde release from endodontic materials. Int Endod J 2015 Sep;48(9):829–838. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12389.
  14. Slutzky-Goldberg I, Slutzky H, et al. Antibacterial properties of four endodontic sealers. J Endod 2008 Jun 1;34(6):735–738. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.012.
  15. Siboni F, Taddei P, et al. Properties of BioRoot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate. Int Endod J 2017 Dec;50:e120–e136. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12856.
  16. Colombo M, Poggio C, et al. Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers. J Clin Exp Dent 2018 Feb;10(2):e120. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54548.
  17. Khalil I, Naaman A, et al. Properties of tricalcium silicate sealers. J Endod 2016 Oct 1;42(10):1529–1535. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016. 06.002.
  18. Zhang H, Shen Y, et al. Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2009 Jul 1;35(7):1051–1055. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.022.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.