Journal of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Influence of Dentin Desensitizers on the Bond Strength of Self-etch Adhesive to Dentin: An in vitro Study

Sneha Jeetendra, Anithakumari Rangappa, Meena Naganathan, Vijayalakshmi Lakshminarasimhaiah

Keywords : Desensitizing agents, Self-etch adhesive, Tensile bond strength.

Citation Information : Jeetendra S, Rangappa A, Naganathan M, Lakshminarasimhaiah V. Influence of Dentin Desensitizers on the Bond Strength of Self-etch Adhesive to Dentin: An in vitro Study. J Oper Dent Endod 2018; 3 (1):18-21.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0050

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-06-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aims and objectives: Hypersensitivity is a multietiological clinical problem. Many desensitizing treatments have been advocated to reduce the hypersensitivity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of few in-office desensitizing agents on the bond strength of composite restoration. Materials and methods: Forty-eight sound human premolars were used for the study. The occlusal surface of each teeth was grounded with a diamond disk to expose the flat dentin surface, polished with 120 and 320 silicon grit sand paper. The specimens were then divided into four groups (n = 12) based on the type of dentin desensitizing agent given. Group I was treated with Vivasens, group II was treated with MS Coat F, group III was treated with Solo Eze, and group IV served as a control where no desensitizing agent was used. The specimens were treated with one-step self-etch and restored with composites according to the manufacturer\'s instructions. The specimens were then stored in distilled water for 24 hours and subjected to Universal Testing Machine to check the tensile bond strength. Results: Statistical analysis of the data obtained revealed the mean values for the tensile bond strengths were 92.53, 71.07, 95.07, 160.28 N for groups I to IV respectively. These values were statistically significantly different between groups pretreated with desensitizing agents as compared with control group. Conclusion: Dentin pretreated with desensitizing agents has lower tensile bond strength with resin composites as compared with dentin that is untreated. Among the experimental groups, hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-containing desensitizing agents had better bond strength compared with the fluoridecontaining agents.


PDF Share
  1. Makkar S, Goyal M, Kaushal A, Hegde V. Effect of desensitizing treatments on bond strength of resin composites to dentin—an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014 Sep;17(5): 458-461.
  2. Arisu HD, Dalkihç E, Üçtali MB. Effect of desensitizing agents on the microtensile bond strength of a two-step selfetch adhesive to dentin. Oper Dent 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2): 153-161.
  3. Dababneh RH, Khouri AT, Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: dentine hypersensitivity—an enigma? A review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management. Br Dent J 1999 Dec;187(11):606-611.
  4. Walters PA. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 May;6(2):107-117.
  5. Akca T, Yazici AR, Celik C, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. The effect of desensitizing treatments on the bond strength of resin composite to dentin mediated by a self-etching primer. Oper Dent 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):451-456.
  6. Pathan AB, Bolla N, Kavuri SR, Sunil CR, Damaraju B, Pattan SK. Ability of three desensitizing agents in dentinal tubule obliteration and durability: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016 Jan;19(1):31-36.
  7. Seara SF, Erthal BS, Ribeiro M, Kroll L, Pereira GD. The influence of a dentin desensitizer on the microtensile bond strength of two bonding systems. Oper Dent 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2): 154-160.
  8. Awang RA, Masudi SM, MohdNor WZ. Effect of desensitizing agent on shear bond strength of an adhesive system. Arch Orofac Sci 2007;2:32-35.
  9. Xu J, Stangel I, Butler IS, Gilson DF. An FT-Raman spectroscopic investigation of dentin and collagen surfaces modified by 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate. J Dent Res 1997 Jan;76(1): 596-601.
  10. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ. A TEM study of two waterbased adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 1998 Jan;77(1):50-59.
  11. Sengun A, Koyuturk AE, Sener Y, Ozer F. Effect of desensitizers on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to caries-affected dentin on the gingival wall. Oper Dent 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):430-435.
  12. Paes Leme A, dos Santos JC, Giannini M, Wada RS. Occlusion of dentin tubules by desensitizing agents. Am J Dent 2004 Oct;17(5):368-372.
  13. Sun Medical. Available from: www.Sunmedical.
  14. Didem A. Comparative mechanical properties of bulk-fill resins. Open J Comp Mater 2014;4:117-121.
  15. Yasa B, Arslan H, Yasa E, Akcay M, Hatirli H. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2016;74(2):96-102.
  16. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures. Quintessence Int 1994 Apr;25(4): 269-275.
  17. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/ onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003 Dec;23(6):543-555.
  18. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997;10(5): 237-241.
  19. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2005 Dec;21(12):1150-1157.
  20. Fujita K, Nishiyama N, Nemoto K. Effect of base monomer's refractive index on curing depth and polymerization conversion of photo-cured resin composites. Dent Mater J 2005 Sep;24(3):403-408.
  21. Yeolekar TS, Chowdhary NR, Mukunda KS, Kiran NK. Evaluation of microleakage and marginal ridge fracture resistance of primary molars restored with three restorative materials: a comparative in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015 May- Aug;8(2):108-113.
  22. Allara FW Jr, Diefenderfer KE, Molinaro JD. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance. Am J Dent 2004 Aug;17(4):228-232.
  23. Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2008 Mar;99(3):225-232.
  24. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005 Oct;21(10): 962-970.
  25. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014 Aug;42(8):993-1000.
  26. Atiyah AH, Baban LM. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with extensive MOD cavities restored with different composite restorations. An In vitro study. J Bagh Coll Dentistry 2014;26(1):7-15.
  27. Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2013 Aug;29(8):835-841.
  28. Xu HH, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, Peterson RC, Antonucci JM, Mueller HJ. Continuous-fiber preform reinforcement of dental resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2003 Sep;19(6):523-530.
  29. Petersen RC. Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composites above critical length. J Dent Res 2005 Apr;84(4):365-370.
  30. Toz T, Tuncer S, Bozkurt FO, Tuncer AK, Bag HG. The effect of bulk-fill flowable composites on the fracture resistance and cuspal deflection of endodontically treated premolars. J Adhes Sci Tech 2015;29(15):1581-1592.
  31. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effectiveness of endodontic disinfecting solutions against young and old Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals. J Endod 2012 Oct;38(10): 1376-1379.
  32. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2000 Jun;26(6):331-334.
  33. Nagayoshi M, Kitamura C, Fukuizumi T, Nishihara T, Terashita M. Antimicrobial effect of ozonated water on bacteria invading dentinal tubules. J Endod 2004 Nov;30(11):778-781.
  34. Tiwari S, Avinash A, Katiyar S, Aarthi Iyer A, Jain S. Dental applications of ozone therapy: a review of literature. Saud J Dent Res 2017 Jan-Jul;8(1):105-111.
  35. Attiguppe PR, Tewani KK, Naik SV, Yavagal CM, Nadig B. Comparative evaluation of different modes of laser assisted endodontics in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017 Apr;11(4):124-127.
  36. Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E, Pahlitzsch M, Maier- Wenzel AKB, Torun N, Klamann MKJ. Contralateral eye comparison study in MICS and MIGS: Trabectome® vs. iStent inject®. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2017;255:359- 365.
  37. Kurji K, Rudinsky CJ, Rayat JS, Arora S, Sandhu S, Damji KF, Dorey MW. Phaco-trabectome versus phacoiStent in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol2017;52(1):99-106.
  38. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. London: Cochrane Collaboration; c2011 March 2011.
  39. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Quality Assessment for Case Series [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2017 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ cg3/resources/appendix-4-quality-of-case-seriesform2.
  40. Malvankar-Mehta MS, Chen YN, Iordanous Y, Wang WW, Costella J, Hutnik CML. iStent as a solo procedure for glaucoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2015;10(5):e0128146.
  41. Malvankar-Mehta MS, Iordanous Y, Chen YN. iStent with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone for patients with glaucoma and cataract: a meta-analysis. PLoS One2015;10(7):e0131770.
  42. Bahler CK, Smedley GT, Zhou J, Johnson DH. Trabecular bypass stents decrease intraocular pressure in cultured human anterior segments. Am J Ophthalmol2004;138(6):988-994.
  43. Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC. Postoperative complications in the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol2012;153(5):804-814.
  44. Iordanous Y, Kent JS, Hutnik CML, Malvankar-Mehta MS. Projected cost comparison of Trabectome, iStent, and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus glaucoma medication in the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. J Glaucoma2014;23:e112-118.
  45. Kaplowitz K, Bussel II, Honkanen R, Schuman JS, Loewen NA. Review and meta-analysis of ab-interno trabeculectomy outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100(5):594-600.
  46. Almeida Junior GC, Arakawa L, Santi Neto DD, Cury PM, Lima Filho AA, Sousa SJ, Alves MR, Azoubel R. Preoperative tranilast as adjunctive therapy to primary pterygium surgery with a 1-year follow-up. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2015 Jan-Feb; 78(1):1-5.
  47. Bahar I, Lusky M, Gaton D, Robinson A, Avisar R, Weinberger D. The use of fibrin adhesive in trabeculectomy: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 2006 Nov;90(11):1430.
  48. Bahar I, Weinberger D, Lusky M, Avisar R, Robinson A, Gaton D. Fibrin glue as a suture substitute: histological evaluation of trabeculectomy in rabbit eyes. Curr Eye Res 2006 Jan;31(1):31-36.
  49. Buschmann W, Stemberger A, Blumel G, Leydhecker W. Fibrin adhesion and postoperative anti-fibrinolytic care of conjunctival wounds. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1984 Mar;184(3):185-188.
  50. Choudhari NS, Neog A, Latka S, Srinivasan B. Fibrin sealantassisted revision of the exposed Ahmed tube. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2015 Jan-Mar;22(1):115-116.
  51. Choudhari NS, Neog A, Sharma A, Iyer GK, Srinivasan B. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013 Jun;61(6):312-313.
  52. Choudhari NS, Neog A, Sharma A, Iyer GK, Srinivasan B. Our experience of fibrin sealant-assisted implantation of Ahmed glaucoma valve. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013 Jan-Feb;61(1): 23-27.
  53. Dal Pizzol MM, Roggia MF, Kwitko S, Marinho DR, Rymer S. Use of fibrin glue in ocular surgery. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2009 May-Jun;72(3):308-312.
  54. Dintelmann T, Lieb WE, Grehn F. Filtering bleb revision. Techniques and outcome. Ophthalmologe 2002 Dec;99(12): 917-921.
  55. Du TT, Saffra N. Acellular dermal graft as a treatment of recurrent conjunctival wound dehiscence. Arch Ophthalmol 2009 Nov;127(11):1520-1521.
  56. Elmalem VI, Harris GJ. Occurrence and surgical management of a cerebrospinal fluid-filled cystoid space following routine enucleation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012 Sep-Oct;28(5):e117-e118.
  57. Esquenazi S, Rand W, Velazquez G, Grunstein L. Novel therapeutic approach in the management of band keratopathy using amniotic membrane transplantation with fibrin glue. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2008 Sep-Oct;39(5): 418-421.
  58. Freeman PD, Kahook MY, Curtis TH. Glaucoma drainage device implantation in children using fibrin glue. J AAPOS 2010 Apr;14(2):169-171.
  59. Piltz JR, Starita RJ. The use of subconjunctivally administered tissue plasminogen activator after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmic Surg 1994 Jan;25(1):51-53.
  60. Por YM, Tan YL, Mehta JS, Tan DT. Intracameral fibrin tissue sealant as an adjunct in tectonic lamellar keratoplasty for large corneal perforations. Cornea 2009 May;28(4):451-455.
  61. Sakarya Y, Sakarya R, Yildirim A. Sutureless amniotic membrane fixation with fibrin glue in symptomatic bullous keratopathy with poor visual potential. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010 Jan-Feb;20(1):249; author reply 249-250.
  62. Lee GA, Holcombe DJ. Surgical revision of dysfunctional filtration blebs with bleb preservation sliding conjunctival flap and fibrin glue. Eye (Lond) 2010 Jun;24(6):947-953.
  63. Kahook MY, Noecker RJ. Fibrin glue-assisted glaucoma drainage device surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2006 Dec;90(12):1486-1489.
  64. Valimaki J. Fibrin glue for preventing immediate postoperative hypotony following glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006 Jun;84(3):372-374.
  65. Malhotra C, Jain AK. Human amniotic membrane transplantation: different modalities of its use in ophthalmology. World J Transplant 2014 Jun;4(2):111-121.
  66. Dua HS, Gomes JA, King AJ, Maharajan VS. The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):51-77.
  67. Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Ohashi Y, Tsubota K. Antiinflammatory effects of amniotic membrane transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Cornea 2001 May;20(4):408-413.
  68. Yazdani S, Mahboobipour H, Pakravan M, Doozandeh A, Ghahari E. Adjunctive mitomycin c or amniotic membrane transplantation for Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: a randomized clinical trial. J Glaucoma 2016 May;25(5):415-421.
  69. Sheha H, Kheirkhah A, Taha H. Amniotic membrane transplantation in trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2008 Jun-Jul;17(4):303-307.
  70. Khairy HA, Elsawy MF. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C versus trabeculectomy with amniotic membrane transplant: a medium-term randomized controlled trial. J Glaucoma 2015 Sep;24(7):556-559.
  71. Rauscher FM, Barton K, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Tseng SC. Long-term outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation for repair of leaking glaucoma filtering blebs. Am J Ophthalmol 2007 Jun;143(6):1052-1054.
  72. Sethi P, Patel RN, Goldhardt R, Ayyala RS. Conjunctival advancement with subconjunctival amniotic membrane draping technique for leaking cystic blebs. J Glaucoma 2016 Feb;25(2):188-192.
  73. Kitagawa K, Yanagisawa S, Watanabe K, Yunoki T, Hayashi A, Okabe M, Nikaido T. A hyperdry amniotic membrane patch using a tissue adhesive for corneal perforations and bleb leaks. Am J Ophthalmol 2009 Sep;148(3):383-389.
  74. Nagai-Kusuhara A, Nakamura M, Fujioka M, Negi A. Longterm results of amniotic membrane transplantation-assisted bleb revision for leaking blebs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008 Apr;246(4):567-571.
  75. Rai P, Lauande-Pimentel R, Barton K. Amniotic membrane as an adjunct to donor sclera in the repair of exposed glaucoma drainage devices. Am J Ophthalmol 2005 Dec;140(6): 1148-1152.
  76. Ainsworth G, Rotchford A, Dua HS, King AJ. A novel use of amniotic membrane in the management of tube exposure following glaucoma tube shunt surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2006 Apr;90(4):417-419.
  77. Papadaki TG, Siganos CS, Zacharopoulos IP, Panteleontidis V, Charissis SK. Human amniotic membrane transplantation for tube exposure after glaucoma drainage device implantation. J Glaucoma 2007 Jan;16(1):171-172.
  78. Mulder EJ, Leiblum DM, Visser GH. Fetal breathing movements in late diabetic pregnancy: relationship to fetal heart rate patterns and Braxton Hicks’ contractions. Early Hum Dev 1995 Nov;43(3):225-232.
  79. Schulte FJ, Michaelis R, Nolte R, Albert G, Parl U, Lasson U. Brain and behavioral maturation in newborn infants of diabetic mothers. I. Nerve conduction and EEG patterns. Neuropadiatrie 1969 Jan-Jul;1(1):24-35.
  80. Devoe LD, Youssef AA, Castillo RA, Croom CS. Fetal biophysical activities in third-trimester pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 Aug;171(2):298-303.
  81. Dierker LJ Jr, Pillay S, Sorokin Y, Rosen MG. The change in fetal activity periods in diabetic and nondiabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982 May;143(2):181-185.
  82. Doherty NN, Hepper PG. Habituation in fetuses of diabetic mothers. Early Hum Dev 2000 Aug;59(2):85-93.
  83. Kainer F, Prechtl HF, Engele H, Einspieler C. Assessment of the quality of general movements in fetuses and infants of women with type-1 diabetes mellitus. Early Hum Dev 1997 Nov;50(1):13-25.
  84. Mulder EJ, O'Brien MJ, Lems YL, Visser GH, Prechtl HF. Body and breathing movements in near-term fetuses and newborn infants of type-1 diabetic women. Early Hum Dev 1990 Nov;24(2):131-152.
  85. Mulder EJ, Visser GH. Growth and motor development in fetuses of women with type-1 diabetes. I. Early growth patterns. Early Hum Dev 1991 May;25(2):91-106.
  86. Mulder EJ, Visser GH. Growth and motor development in fetuses of women with type-1 diabetes. II. Emergence of specific movement patterns. Early Hum Dev 1991 May;25(2):107-115.
  87. Mulder EJ, Visser GH. Impact of early growth delay on subsequent fetal growth and functional development: a study on diabetic pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 1992 Dec;31(2):91-95.
  88. Mulder EJ, Visser GH, Bekedam DJ, Prechtl HF. Emergence of behavioral states in fetuses of type-1 diabetic women. Early Hum Dev 1987 Jul;15(4):231-251.
  89. Mulder EJ, Visser GH, Morssink LP, de Vries JI. Growth and motor development in fetuses of women with type-1 diabetes. III. First trimester quantity of fetal movement patterns. Early Hum Dev 1991 May;25(2):117-133.
  90. Aberg A, Westbom L, Kallen B. Congenital malformations among infants whose mothers had gestational diabetes or preexisting diabetes. Early Hum Dev 2001 Mar;61(2):85-95.
  91. Deregnier RA, Nelson CA, Thomas KM, Wewerka S, Georgieff MK. Neurophysiologic evaluation of auditory recognition memory in healthy newborn infants and infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr 2000 Dec;137(6):777-784.
  92. Nelson CA, Wewerka S, Thomas KM, Tribby-Walbridge S, deRegnier R, Georgieff M. Neurocognitive sequelae of infants of diabetic mothers. Behav Neurosci 2000 Oct;114(5):950-956.
  93. Reece EA, Homko CJ. Infant of the diabetic mother. Semin Perinatol 1994 Oct;18(5):459-469.
  94. Reece EA, Homko CJ. Why do diabetic women deliver malformed infants? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000 Mar;43(1):32-45.
  95. Rizzo T, Metzger BE, Burns WJ, Burns K. Correlations between antepartum maternal metabolism and intelligence of offspring. N Engl J Med 1991 Sep;325(13):911-916.
  96. Rizzo TA, Metzger BE, Dooley SL, Cho NH. Early malnutrition and child neurobehavioral development: insights from the study of children of diabetic mothers. Child Dev 1997 Feb;68(1):26-38.
  97. Schwartz R, Teramo KA. Effects of diabetic pregnancy on the fetus and newborn. Semin Perinatol 2000 Apr;24(2):120-135.
  98. Vaarasmaki MS, Hartikainen A, Anttila M, Pramila S, Koivisto M. Factors predicting peri- and neonatal outcome in diabetic pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 2000 Jul;59(1):61-70.
  99. Robertson SS, Dierker LJ. Fetal cyclic motor activity in diabetic pregnancies: sensitivity to maternal blood glucose. Dev Psychobiol 2003 Jan;42(1):9-16.
  100. Accardo PJ, Blondis TA, Whitman BY. Disorders of attention and activity level in a referral population. Pediatrics 1990 Mar;85(3 Pt 2):426-431.
  101. Ornoy A, Uriel L, Tennenbaum A. Inattention, hyperactivity and speech delay at 2-4 years of age as a predictor for ADDADHD syndrome. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 1993;30(3):155-163.
  102. Smyth TR. Impaired motor skill (clumsiness) in otherwise normal children: a review. Child Care Health Dev 1992 Sep-Oct;18(5):283-300.
  103. Petersen MB, Pedersen SA, Greisen G, Pedersen JF, Mølsted- Pedersen L. Early growth delay in diabetic pregnancy: relation to psychomotor development at age 4. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Feb;296(6622):598-600.
  104. Sells CJ, Robinson NM, Brown Z, Knopp RH. Long-term developmental follow-up of infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr 1994 Jul;125(1):S9-S17.
  105. Vladareanu R, Lebit D, Constantinescu S. Ultrasound assessment of fetal neurobehaviour in high risk pregnancies. DSJUOG 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):132-147.
  106. Talic A, Kurjak A, Ahmed B, Stanojevic M, Predojevic M, Kadic AS, Di Renzo GC. The potential of 4D sonography in the assessment of fetal behavior in high-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011 Jul;24(7):948-954.
  107. Bekedam DJ, Visser GH, de Vries JJ, Prechtl HF. Motor behaviour in the growth retarded fetus. Early Hum Dev 1985 Nov;12(2):155-165.
  108. Cioni G, Prechtl HF. Preterm and early postterm motor behaviour in low-risk premature infants. Early Hum Dev 1990 Sep;23(3):159-191.
  109. Seme-Ciglenecki P. Predictive value of assessment of general movements for neurological development of highrisk preterm infants: comparative study. Croat Med J 2003 Dec;44(6):721-727.
  110. Abo-Yaqoub S, Kurjak A, Mohammed AB, Shadad A, Abdel-Maaboud M. The role of 4-D ultrasonography in prenatal assessment of fetal neurobehaviour and prediction of neurological outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012 Mar;25(3):231-236.
  111. Athanasiadis AP, Mikos T, Tambakoudis GP, Theodoridis TD, Papastergiou M, Assimakopoulos E, Tarlatzis BC. Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013 Mar;26(4):363-368.
  112. Fauser BC, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, Legro RS, Balen AH, Lobo R, Carmina E, Chang J, Yildiz BO, Laven JS, et al. Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril 2012 Jan;97(1):28-38.e25
  113. Sirmans SM, Pate KA. Epidemiology, diagnosis and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Epidemiol 2014; 6:1-13.
  114. Fauser BC, Diedrich K, Bouchard P, Domínguez F, Matzuk M, Franks S, Hamamah S, Simón C, Devroey P, Ezcurra D, et al. Contemporary genetic technologies and female reproduction. Human Reproduction Update 2011 Nov;17(6):829-847.
  115. Balen A, Conway G, Kaltsas G. Polycystic ovary syndrome: the spectrum of the disorder in 1741 patients. Hum Reprod 1995 Aug;10(8):2107-2111.
  116. Azziz R, Sanchez L, Knochenhauer ES, Moran C, Lazenby J, Stephens KC, Taylor K, Boots LR. Androgen excess in women: experience with over 1000 consecutive patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004 Feb;89(2):453-462.
  117. Wild S, Pierpoint T, McKeigue P, Jacobs H. Cardiovascular disease in women with polycystic ovary syndrome at longterm follow-up: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000 May;52(5):595-600.
  118. Hollinrake E, Abreu A, Maifeld M, Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Increased risk of depressive disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2007 Jun;87(6): 1369-1376.
  119. Zawadski JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome. In: Givens JHF, Merriman G, editors. The polycystic ovary syndrome. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific; 1992. p. 377-384.
  120. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004 Jan;81(1):19-25.
  121. Azziz R, Carmina E, DeWailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, Janssen OE, Legro RS, Norman RJ, Taylor AE, et al. Position statement: criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: an Androgen Excess Society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006 Nov;91(11):4237-4245.
  122. Lujan ME, Jarrett BY, Brooks ED, Reines JK, Peppin AK, Muhn N, Haider E, Pierson RA, Chizen DR. Updated ultrasound criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: reliable thresholds for elevated follicle population and ovarian volume. Hum Reprod 2013 May;28(5):1361-1368.
  123. Badawy A, Elnashar A. Treatment options for polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Womens Health 2011 Feb;3:25-35.
  124. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No 108: Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Oct;114(4):936-949.
  125. Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008 Mar;89(3): 505-522.
  126. Balen AH. Ovulation induction in the management of anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2013 Jul;373(1-2):77-82.
  127. Berridge DL, Winter TC. Saline infusion sonohysterography: technique, indications, and imaging findings. J Ultrasound Med 2004 Jan;23(1):97-112.
  128. Allison SJ, Horrow MM, Kim HY, Lev-Toaff AS. Salineinfused sonohysterography: tips for achieving greater success. Radiographics 2011 Nov-Dec;31(7):1991-2004.
  129. O'Neill MJ. Sonohysterography. Radiol Clin North Am 2003 Jul;41(4):781-797.
  130. Bonnamy L, Marret H, Perrotin F, Body G, Berger C, Lansac J. Sonohysterography: a prospective survey of results and complications in 81 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002 Apr;102(1):42-47.
  131. Lindheim SR, Adsuar N, Kushner DM, Pritts EA, Olive DL. Sonohysterography: a valuable tool in evaluating the female pelvis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003 Nov;58(11):770-784.
  132. Lindheim SR, Sprague C, Winter TC. Hysterosalpingography and sonohysterography: lessons in technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 Jan;186(1):24-29.
  133. Jeanty P, Besnard S, Arnold A, Turner C, Crum P. Air-contrast sonohysterography as a first step assessment of tubal patency. J Ultrasound Med 2000 Aug;19(8):519-527.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.