Journal of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Current Trends in Irrigation Practice during Endodontic Treatment among Dental Practitioners in Nellore Urban Area: A Survey

Madhusudhana Koppolu, Yelloji Paramesh, Chinni Suneelkumar, Anumula Lavanya

Citation Information : Koppolu M, Paramesh Y, Suneelkumar C, Lavanya A. Current Trends in Irrigation Practice during Endodontic Treatment among Dental Practitioners in Nellore Urban Area: A Survey. J Oper Dent Endod 2016; 1 (2):47-55.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10047-0011

Published Online: 01-12-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in irrigation practice among the practicing dentists in Nellore urban area of Andhra Pradesh, India.

Materials and methods

A self-prepared questionnaire comprising 20 questions was given to 150 dentists practicing in Nellore urban area. The information gathered was the individual irrigant selection, irrigant concentration, smear layer removal, and use of adjuncts to irrigation, gauge of needle, tip design of needle, depth of needle penetration, volume of the syringe used, volume of irrigant used, duration of irrigation, choice of irrigant in vital teeth, teeth with radiographic evidence of periapical lesion, and retreatment cases.

Results

Our data indicated that majority of respondents (55.6%) are using saline as primary irrigant at a concentration of 0.9% whereas 44.4% of respondents primarily use sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), with 51.4% of them using it at a concentration of 2.6 to 4%. Twenty-six gauge needle with single-beveled tip design being most preferred for syringe irrigation. Only 59.7% of respondents aimed to remove the smear layer during endodontic treatment with only 11.9% using an adjunct to irrigation.

Conclusion

Regardless of the critical nature of the irrigation step in the endodontic therapy, the results from the study were not satisfying, especially when it comes to the use of primary irrigant, adjuncts, or newer irrigating systems. Thus there is a need to regularly update and check the practices adopted by dental practitioners.

How to cite this article

Koppolu M, Paramesh Y, Suneelkumar C, Lavanya A. Current Trends in Irrigation Practice during Endodontic Treatment among Dental Practitioners in Nellore Urban Area: A Survey. J Oper Dent Endod 2016;1(2):47-55.


PDF Share
  1. Irrigation protocol among endodontic faculty and post-graduate students in dental colleges of India: a survey. J Conserv Dent 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):394-398.
  2. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 2001 Apr;34(3):221-230.
  3. Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system. Int Endod J 2010 Nov;43(11):1001-1012.
  4. Complications during root canal irrigation: literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 2000 May;33(3):186-193.
  5. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of six irrigants on primary endodontic pathogens. J Endod 2005 Jun;31(6):471-473.
  6. The effect of exposure to irrigant solutions on apical dentin bio-films in vitro. J Endod 2006 May;32(5):434-437.
  7. Smear layer removal by root canal irrigants. A comparative scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994 Sep;78(3):359-367.
  8. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009 Jun;35(6):791-804.
  9. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J 2000 Sep;33(5):435-441.
  10. Philosophies and practices regarding the management of the endodontic smear layer: results from two surveys. J Endod 2001 Aug;27(8):537-539.
  11. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. Int Endod J 2002 Sep;35(9):759-767.
  12. A survey of sodium hypochlorite use by general dental practitioners and endodontists in Australia. Aust Dent J 2003 Mar;48(1):20-26.
  13. Survey of attitudes, materials and methods employed in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners in North Jordan. BMC Oral Health 2004 Sep 10;4(1):1.
  14. Irrigation trends among American association of endodontists members: a web-based survey. J Endod 2012 Jan;38(1):37-40.
  15. An endodontic practice profile amongst general dental practitioners in Kathmandu: a questionnaire survey. J Coll Med Sci Nepal 2013;9(4):40-50.
  16. A survey on endodontic irrigants used by dentists in Pakistan. Pak Oral Dent J 2014 Dec;34(4):730-734.
  17. A survey of irrigation practice among dental practitioners in Himachal Pradesh. Dent J Adv Stud 2014;2(2):80-83.
  18. Differences in disinfection protocols for root canal treatments between general dentists and endodontists: a web-based survey. J Am Dent Assoc 2015 Jul;146(7):536-543.
  19. Choice of root canal irrigants by Serbian dental practitioners. Vojnosanit Pregl 2016 Jan;73(1):47-52.
  20. A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK. Int Endod J 2001 Jan;34(1):16-22.
  21. Root canal treatment in general practice in Sudan. Int Endod J 2000 Jul;33(4):316-319.
  22. Antibacterial effect of various endodontic irrigants on selected anaerobic bacterias. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993 Jun;9(3):95-100.
  23. Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canals in vivo study. J Endod 2004 Feb;30(2):84-87.
  24. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006 May;32(5):389-398.
  25. Sequence of irrigation in endodontics. Oral Health 2005 May;95:62-65.
  26. In vitro disinfection of dentinal tubules by various endodontics irrigants. J Endod 1999 Dec;25(12):786-788.
  27. Characterization of reactive oxygen species generated from the mixture of NaOCI and H2O2 used as root canal irrigants. J Endod 2000 Jan;26(1):11-15.
  28. Efficacy of four irrigation needles in cleaning the apical third of root canals. Braz Dent J 2013;24(1):21-24.
  29. An in vitro evaluation of the irrigating characteristics of ultrasonic and subsonic handpieces and irrigating needles and probes. J Endod 1995 May;21(5):277-280
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.